NewEnergyNews More: ND BUYS IN ON MIDWEST WIRES FOR WIND

YESTERDAY

  • SUNDAY WORLD- UK WIND ON TRACK TO PASS NUCLEAR, BUILD 30 GW BY 2020
  • SUNDAY WORLD- WILL NEW ENERGY BOOM IN TURKEY?
  • SUNDAY WORLD- WORLD WANTS INT’L F-I-T FOR 100% NEW ENERGY
  • SUNDAY WORLD- SOLAR PV DEAL FOR ISRAEL
  • SUNDAY WORLD- AUSTRALIA STILL GOING FOR EMISSIONS TRADING
  • -------------------

    GET THE DAILY HEADLINES EMAIL: CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

    -------------------

    THE DAY BEFORE

  • Saturday Video: Today Is The Day
  • Saturday Video: Time To Act Up
  • Saturday Video: Because The World Needs To Know
  • THE DAY BEFORE THE DAY BEFORE

    THINGS-TO-THINK-ABOUT FRIDAY, 10-23:

  • TTTA Friday- TOP WIND GROUP EXPOSES BOGUS ATTACK ON F-I-T
  • TTTA Friday- BIG SUN GROUP BACKS FEED-INS
  • TTTA Friday- NEW ORLEANS CAN SUE EMITTERS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE DAMAGES
  • TTTA Friday- DEFINE ENDANGERED
  • TTTA Friday- SUN-POWERED A/C
  • THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: HOW NEW ENERGY GROWS
  • MORE NEWS, 10-22: WIND WEATHERS ECONOMIC STORM; NEVER A BETTER TIME TO BUY SUN; BUT WILL THE CO2 STAY?; AMERICAN BATHS AND SHOWERS
  • AND THE DAY BEFORE THAT

  • HEADLINE: ALL NEW ENERGY BY 2030?
  • MORE NEWS, 10-21: FEDS FUND HOME RETROFITS; ATLANTIC CITY LIKES OFFSHORE WIND; EYES ON THE EV PRIZE; GEOTHERMAL OIL PUMPS
  • THE LAST DAY UP HERE

  • HEADLINE: LATEST NEW ENERGY JOB TRENDS – JOBS! (AND WHERE THEY ARE)
  • MORE NEWS, 10-20: NEW ENERGY IS CHEAPEST ENERGY; GERMANY WINS SOLAR DECATHLON; SOLAR POWER PLANTS FOR FLA; BIOFUELS NEED CLOSER LOOK
  • --------------------------

    Anne B. Butterfield of DAILY CAMERA, is a biweekly contributor to NewEnergyNews

    -------------------

  • Necessary but not sufficient
  • Anne B. Butterfield, October 12, 2009 (Daily Camera)

    We have all heard about the woman who marries her live-in sweetheart, even though he was known to be a womanizer. Even two weeks before the wedding day Rosie found Mark in bed with another woman, but she was too invested in his wealth to break the engagement. Also his community, so elegant with traditions that she`d not remotely known in her childhood, had become her home. If not marry him, where was she to go?

    Rosie and Mark are a parable for every player in Washington toiling away on the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACESA) intended to wean us off of fossil fuels. Mark can`t stop womanizing, Rosie has long been giving favors for advancement; leaders like these do not have the mettle to pinpoint and pursue the very finest solutions.

    But we might be wise to see the bill as Thomas Friedman did when he said of ACESA: "It is appalling, a mess. I detest it. Now hurry up and pass it."

    Even the illusion of fidelity can provide some leverage. The bill`s existence for December`s climate treaty negotiations in Copenhagen is pivotal; America is the world`s worst emitter and our failure to bring a comprehensive bill to Copenhagen, even a pockmarked unfinished stinker, will send exactly the wrong signal.

    Those who rationally protest the ACES bill, such as the members of Climate SOS, describe the bill as inadequate for its low targets and, "worse than doing nothing" due to itscap-and-trade structure plus its allowances, offsets, permission for coal plants, plus-size funding for chimerical carbon capture and storage, and reliance on biomass combustion. Worst of all is the waiver of the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gases, in the version passed by the House of Representatives.

    SOS prefers direct regulation to bring nearly 100 percent carbon emission reduction in 20-30 years through an energy efficiency portfolio standard as well as extreme ramp-up of renewable energy, zero waste, sustainable agriculture, and more. This would be paid for through a carbon fee or a carbon tax and dividend scheme that pays out most of its resources directly to citizens.

    The problem is that they at SOS seem to believe that Congress can do better. And, behold, our government is still in bed with the other the woman, subsidizing fossil fuels.

    Only last month did the prominent voice of President Obama call for a worldwide stop to such nonsense.

    That`s a little like Mark canceling the Playboy Channel the day before the wedding.

    One prominent supporter of the ACES bill, former Deputy of the Department of Energy and renowned climate blogger, Joseph Romm, advises:

    "And for those who say this doesn`t do enough -- I agree 100 percent. But then the original Clean Air Act didn`t do enough." He cites also the 1987 Montréal protocol as inadequate to save the ozone layer, continuing, "but it began a process and established a framework that, like the CAA, could be strengthened over time as the science warranted. The painful reality of climate change is going to become increasingly obvious in the coming years, and strengthening is inevitable."

    In short, the ACES bill is necessary but not sufficient. We have seen this before. Did women earn full citizenship just after suffrage was passed? Did blacks enjoy social equality just after slavery was abolished, or even after the civil rights movement? Did most states impose best available control technologies on updated power plants just because the Clean Air Act said so?

    No, no and no.

    Environmentalists are in no way fooled by the ACES bill`s failure to deliver the needed emissions reductions. The planet`s survival relies partly on a climate bill but mostly on continued grassroots assault on coal plants and other offenders, plus disruptive clean technologies to take our markets by storm.

    It would be nice to have a sterling market signal in the form of a carbon tax, but with only ExxonMobil strutting in favor of this, people are reasonable to look on philanderers as more trustworthy friends.

    The trick is to keep the EPA vested with authority to regulate emissions, as, according to Climate SOS, some biomass and trash incineration schemes portend to have emissions much worse than burning coal.

    Our work will not be finished with a climate bill; it only will begin, just as Rosie and Mark, once married, finally get to learn what fidelity can mean. And if we don`t like this climate bill, we can take our chances on ExxonMobil.

    -------------------

    Anne's previous NewEnergyNews columns:

  • Necessary but not sufficient (October 14, 2009)
  • Tort reform: Go big, Obama! (September 14, 2009)
  • Xcel takes aim at Boulder’s solar (July 27, 2009)
  • Selfishly seeking clean energy (July 12, 2009)
  • The big ka-ching in our health care wallet (June 19, 2009)
  • It takes a Governor (May 24, 2009)
  • Want a job? Think Wind. (May 10, 2009)
  • Just Say No to Xcess Energy (April 28, 2009)
  • NREL’s history of fickle funding (April 12, 2009)
  • Wagons firmly circled: Governance at REA’s and Tri-State (March 26, 2009)
  • A new migratory pattern: Colorado youth go to Washington (March 12, 2009)
  • Even coal is in for a revolution (February 22, 2009)
  • High Flyers and the Commons (February 11, 2009)
  • Come on Baby, Sit by Me (January 25, 2009)
  • A return on investment (January 3, 2009)
  • Mr. Secretary, we're watching you (December 28, 2008)
  • Canary in the Coal Mine (December 13, 2008)
  • Crash test dummies (November 16, 2008)
  • Needless markup (November 2, 2008)
  • The flap about 58 (October 19, 2008)
  • Hip towns and a clever measure (October 7, 2008)
  • Are we afraid of change? Still? (September 21, 2008)
  • Cheney in a chignon (September 7, 2008)
  • Don't tick off the blonde (August 10, 2008)
  • Buying us time on global warming (July 27, 2008)
  • Hint from Heloise - It's the pH, Stupid! (July 13, 2008)
  • Nukes: the position ridiculous and the expense damnable (June 29, 2008)

    -------------------

    Name: Herman K. Trabish
    Location: La Crescenta, CA

    *Doctor with my hands *Author of the "OIL IN THEIR BLOOD" series with my head *Student of New Energy with my heart

    -------------------

    -------------------

      A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

    -------------------

    Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • -------------------
  • Wednesday, July 8, 2009

    ND BUYS IN ON MIDWEST WIRES FOR WIND

    3,000-mile Green Power Express has ND partner
    James MacPherson, July 7, 2009 (AP via Forbes)

    "Bismarck-based MDU Resources Group Inc. is the first to join a Michigan company developing a high-voltage power line that its backers say would transmit wind energy from the Dakotas to homes in Chicago and other cities.

    "ITC Holdings Corp., of Novi, Mich., has proposed the Green Power Express project, a 3,000-mile, 765-kilovolt power line from the Dakotas to the Chicago area. It would cost up to $12 billion and go online in 2020. Backers say the Green Power Express is intended to move wind-powered electricity through parts of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana."


    click to enlarge

    "…[T]erms of the agreement are still being negotiated and will not be disclosed. The project, which is still being planned, will still need other backers and financing to move forward…MDU's participation should spur agreements with other companies…

    "MDU, an energy, mining and construction company with operations in 44 states and Brazil, is North Dakota's only Fortune 500 company. It also is based in a state touted as among those with the best wind energy potential in the U.S. The state is among the windiest in the nation because its flat, largely treeless terrain is at the "polar front," an area where cold air from Canada meets warm subtropical air…"


    It's easy to understand why a big energy company would want to get this to market. But is it an excuse to get more coal to market? (click to enlarge)

    "…[T]he exact spot where the line would begin in North Dakota has not been set…[T]he project is not designed to tie in with existing wind farms in North Dakota, or to supply power to North Dakota…North Dakota would benefit from jobs during the construction phase and from tax revenue…The line is still in the early planning stages and faces several regulatory hurdles…[I]t could be years before the project is under way…

    "…[D] evelopers have identified 12,000 megawatts of wind-generated electricity that could be sent through the line…Under federal law…the power line also could be used to transmit electricity from other sources, some not considered so green…"

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home