NewEnergyNews More: WHO IS CCS GOOD FOR?

Every day is Earthday.

Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

-------------------

Your intrepid reporter

-------------------

    A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

-------------------

Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Wednesday, January 6, 2010

    WHO IS CCS GOOD FOR?

    Carbon Trading May Reach $395B in 2014
    January 5, 2010 (Environmental Leader)

    "The connection between carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) and the carbon emissions trading market is growing, as carbon credits accrued from CCS plants will be traded at carbon exchanges, generating more revenue for CCS project developers, according to a new report from ABI Research.

    "…
    [Carbon Capture, Sequestration and Emissions Trading: The Outlook for Global Carbon Markets] evaluates two leading market mechanisms — CCS and carbon emissions trading — for reducing carbon emissions…[It concludes that] CCS allows heavy industries responsible for the greatest amount of carbon emissions to use new technologies to capture the CO2 they generate and store it safely for long periods. The market research firm projects that $14.6 billion will be invested in 73 new CCS projects that will prevent 146 million tons of CO2 from 2009 to 2014."

    CCS: Burying waste in a hole in the ground is what animals do and not worthy of the human ingenuity that can harness the powers of the sun, the wind and the waves. (click to enlarge)

    "A recent audit of the world’s CCS projects, conducted by Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, indicates that carbon capture and storage could lower CO2 emissions by about 19 percent.

    "In carbon emissions trading, governmental or regulatory bodies issue a limited number of allowances or offsets that allow companies to legally release carbon dioxide, but if the emissions exceed a company’s number of allowances, it must buy or trade for more, or face stiff penalties…"


    Emissions trading does not necessarily have to impose higher energy costs. (click to enlarge)

    "…[ABI] forecasts that the global carbon emissions trading market will reach $395 billion in 2014, more than three times the $118 billion in allowances traded in 2008…[and the author says] carbon emission credits need to reach the price of at least $40 per ton of CO2-equivalent for CCS projects to reach commercial status, together with effective policies and regulations and advances in both carbon capture and storage technologies.

    "…
    [CO2 Regulations and Electricity Prices: Cost Estimates from Coal-Fired Power Plants] shows that the financial impact of regulating coal-fired power plants that produce carbon dioxide emissions under a cap-and-trade system is much less than previously projected, and a CCS option could keep the price of carbon credits low. This report finds that for coal-fired plants the break-even price for the adoption of CCS technology is just $25 to $30 per ton of carbon dioxide emissions."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

    << Home