NewEnergyNews More: CAPE WIND GETS ANOTHER YES

Every day is Earthday.

Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

-------------------

Your intrepid reporter

-------------------

    A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

-------------------

Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Monday, May 17, 2010

    CAPE WIND GETS ANOTHER YES

    Cape Wind gets FAA okay
    Beth Daley, May 17, 2010 (Boston Globe)

    "The Federal Aviation Administration [has] determined… that the proposed 130-turbine wind farm in Nantucket Sound will not significantly interfere with planes or radar.

    "The determination of “no hazard” is one of the last approvals Cape Wind Associates needed for the project, which has undergone nine years of permitting review. US Interior Secretary Ken Salazar gave his final okay -- by far the most important decision for the project -- late last month."


    click thru for more info

    "Still, the FAA will require Cape Wind to pay for a roughly $1.5 million radar modification to ensure it can clearly spot planes flying above the wind farm. The company will also have to put $15 million in escrow for two years to pay for a digital radar system if the $1.5 million fix does not work…"

    There are far more mitigations for the radar issue than there are for baseless interference from recalcitrant humans. (click to enlarge)

    "The FAA has reviewed the Cape Wind project four times because each determination expires after about 18 months…[The current approving] assessment comes after the agreement by Cape Wind to make the upgrades…

    "Opponents of the project, who have said they are planning lawsuits over a variety of wind farm issues, said the decision would make air travel near the 440-foot-tall wind turbines dangerous…"

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

    << Home