ON THE NO-ENERGY BILL, 4

There Will Be An Energy Bill...soon
Joe Klein, July 23, 2010 (Time Magazine)

"Why [will there be a energy bill soon]? Because there is a Supreme Court ruling, now three years old, that carbon dioxide is a poison that needs to be cleaned up. Next year, the Environmental Protection Agency will begin regulating the hell out of Co2. The business community won't like that, nor will many Republicans. [and an energy bill putting a price on carbon is the only alternative]…

"…Senator Maria Cantwell…has offered a [Cap and Dividend] bill--with Maine Republican Susan Collins as co-sponsor--that would force the 2000 top polluters to participate in an auction to purchase the right to spew; 75% of the income would be returned as a "dividend" to taxpayers, the other 25% would go to alternative energy… Senator Lindsey Graham…[recently] said he was certain that more than a few of his Republican colleagues would vote for putting a price on carbon…"

click to enlarge

"And so…[the pulling of [Senate] environmental legislation should be considered a pre-election maneuver. Given a choice between taxes and potentially punitive regulations, the wise--the more elegant; the less expensive--choice is a tax every time…

"…It is an essential conservative principle: you tax the things you want to discourage. Pollution is certainly one; dependence on foreign fossil fuels is another--and that's why I hope the next iteration of energy legislation is called: The National Defense Conservation Act."