OF WIND AND BIRDS
Environmentalism needs dose of common sense
Editorial, April 11, 2011 (Rochester Post-Bulletin)
"…[B]ird enthusiasts have been successful in throwing up roadblocks to wind development…On April 4, Xcel Energy abandoned its plan for a $400 million, 150-megawatt wind farm in southeast North Dakota, a project that would have helped the utility company meet Minnesota's requirement that by 2020, it will generate 30 percent of its power from renewable sources. In announcing its change in plans, Xcel cited…the project's [potential] impact on birds.
"…The American Bird Conservancy, which reports with great gravity and mournfulness that wind turbines kill 400,000 birds per year, actually wants federal regulators to consider requiring radar systems at wind farms…[to shut the turbines down automatically when] a flock of birds approaches…Is 400,000 a lot of birds? …[T]he same American Bird Conservancy also contends that free-ranging cats kill a half-billion birds each year in the United States. Perhaps we should ban felines…"
click to enlarge
"…[ Dr. Daniel Klem, zoology professor] at Muhlenburg College in Allentown, Pa…studied bird mortality for more than 20 years…[and] found that one culprit is to blame for nearly 1 billion avian deaths per year — more than cats, hunters, automobiles and wind turbines combined…[Y]ou probably have contributed to this carnage…The culprit? Glass windows. The average bird is far more likely to meet its demise against a patio door or picture window than a wind turbine blade. Yet…no one has introduced any legislation that would require us to replace our window panes…
"We're not suggesting that wind farms should be set up with complete disregard for the flight patterns of birds. Wind-swept bluffs along the Mississippi River might be great places to produce electricity, but they would take a higher-than-acceptable toll on waterfowl and eagles. Common sense should prevail."
click to enlarge
"But let's try to keep things in perspective. What would cause more environmental impact: A new wind farm or a new coal-fired power plant that requires coal to be mined, transported via diesel-powered trains, then burned (causing carbon emissions, release of mercury and other pollution). Then something has to be done with the ash.
"Wind energy is still in its infancy in the United States, and the jury is still out as to whether it will someday be able to stand on its own financially and play a major role in weaning us off of fossil fuels. But if developers and utility companies have to waste time and money fighting unnecessary and often frivolous legal battles, then we better start building more nuclear plants and coal-burners…"
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
<< Home