NewEnergyNews More: UTILITIES’ SNEAK ATTACK ON CA SOLAR

Every day is Earthday.

Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

-------------------

Your intrepid reporter

-------------------

    A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

-------------------

Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Tuesday, July 10, 2012

    UTILITIES’ SNEAK ATTACK ON CA SOLAR

    ‘Sneaky’ PV net-Metering Proposal Slipped Into California Legislation

    Jessica Lillian, 5 July 2012 (Solar Industry)

    “After months of intensive lobbying to ensure maximum solar net-metering availability, California's solar sector came close to seeing its efforts undone - courtesy of a quietly introduced bill sponsored by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E).

    “In May, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted unanimously in favor of a net-metering calculation method that, by some estimates, would boost California's PV installation potential by 2.4 GW to 5.2 GW…However, A.B.2514 - which was initially developed as a bill designed to simply study net-metering's impacts - morphed late last month into legislation that would allow the utilities to revert to their preferred, more-restrictive method of calculating their 5% net-metering cap….”

    “Implementing A.B.2514 as proposed - thus undoing CPUC's decision - would cut California's solar net-metering potential in half, according to [advocacy group] Vote Solar…[T]he careful timing of the net-metering amendment - just before the July 4th holiday - was designed to allow it to slip through…

    “Despite the timing, which Vote Solar criticized as ‘sneaky,’ a range of solar companies, school districts and agricultural firms responded and spoke out against A.B.2514…[and] the Solar Energy Industries Association and Sierra Club California registered their formal opposition to the bill unless it was amended.

    “The solar sector's efforts were successful, as the legislation reverted - for now, at least - to its original scope, calling only for studies of net-metering programs…The legislation's next stop is the appropriations committee…A.B.2514 could still threaten PV deployment in California. The net-metering studies that the legislation orders the CPUC to conduct may not be entirely fair to the solar market…[A.B.2514 requires the analysis] to include the amount of electricity produced and used by PV system owners, even if that electricity is not fed into the grid…”

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

    << Home