NewEnergyNews More: SOLAR COST AT NEW P.A.C.E.

Every day is Earthday.

Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart

email: herman@NewEnergyNews.net

-------------------

Your intrepid reporter

-------------------

    A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.

-------------------

Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Monday, February 1, 2010

    SOLAR COST AT NEW P.A.C.E.

    A lighter burden; A promising way to defray the cost of going green
    January 28, 2010 (The Economist)

    "Switching to solar power may help to save the planet. Homeowners, however, aren’t so sure it will save them money. Energy costs may be lower…but the initial expense of installing solar panels puts many people off.

    "…[T]he city of Berkeley, California…has just completed a pilot programme in which it lends homeowners the money to put panels on their houses. The owners repay the loans over a period of years through an extra charge on their local property-tax bills. The city raised the money to lend by issuing a
    Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) bond, a type of financing geared specifically to making properties more energy-efficient. In the past year 13 states have adopted legislation enabling municipalities and finance companies to issue PACE bonds. Another, Arizona, has a law pending…"

    click to enlarge

    "Berkeley’s programme was small [and the only one so far directed exclusively at solar power]…[I]t started with only $1.5m…Although 40 homes were signed up at first, 27 withdrew, mostly because their owners found cheaper home-equity loans…The bonds the city used to finance the programme paid a yield of 6.75%; once administrative costs were added, homeowners ended up paying the equivalent of 7.75%. Some people ran into further costs when roofs had to be strengthened. Getting building permits was not always straightforward."

    click to enlarge

    "But supporters are undeterred. The bond’s interest rate was so high in part because it was launched during the financial crisis, they say. The addition to the tax bill for the pilot programme, $2,000-4,000 a year depending on the type of installation, is offset by savings on homeowners’ energy bills.

    "Bond investors can take comfort from the fact that tax obligations rank ahead of mortgage loans if homeowners get into financial difficulties. They also benefit from municipal bonds’ tax-exempt status. The state of California is considering expanding the programme by another $25m and taking it to surrounding counties.
    Renewable Funding, the investor in the Berkeley bond, says it is setting up similar agreements with other local governments."

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

    << Home