NewEnergyNews More: Concerns over 2H Fundamentals Emerging -- Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

Every day is Earthday.

Some details about NewEnergyNews and the man behind the curtain: Herman K. Trabish, Agua Dulce, CA., Doctor with my hands, Writer with my head, Student of New Energy and Human Experience with my heart



Your intrepid reporter


    A tip of the NewEnergyNews cap to Phillip Garcia for crucial assistance in the design implementation of this site. Thanks, Phillip.


Pay a visit to the HARRY BOYKOFF page at Basketball Reference, sponsored by NewEnergyNews and Oil In Their Blood.

  • ---------------
  • Thursday, June 9, 2016

    Concerns over 2H Fundamentals Emerging -- Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

    Solar Industry Update: Concerns over 2H Fundamentals Emerging/7 June 2016/Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

    [Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MCI (P) 057/04/2016.

    Vishal Shah/Research Analyst/(+1) 212 250-0028/

    Bottom line

    In this note, we provide our thoughts and most commonly asked questions from investors following meetings with company managements and over 50 investors over the past few weeks. Our general take is that solar sector has still not completely emerged from the shadows of SUNE bankruptcy and balance sheet quality remains the biggest source of investor concern in the solar sector. Complicating the investment process is the complexity of solar business models and difficulty in modeling a path for sustainable cash flow generation. Against this backdrop, we prefer FSLR, SPWR and VSLR.

    Concerns over 2H Fundamentals Emerging

    We expect fundamentals to remain challenging in 2H16 as demand from China market could likely decline from 2H. With the US market unlikely to see the ITC rush and no other major market expected to pick-up the slack from China slowdown, investors are rightly concerned about the risk of oversupply from 2H16. Moreover, a significant amount of new supply is expected to come online in 2017 raising concerns over potential pricing/margin pressure for module manufacturers.

    Resi Leasing Sector Investor Sentiment Remains the Weakest

    Financing still remains the biggest question - for resi solar leasing companies, investors are generally concerned about the net metering policy changes in a few states such as Arizona, Nevada and implications for policy decisions in other states. Additionally, investors are rightly concerned about the availability of financing required to execute growth plans. Investor concerns are also fueled by the weaker than expected fundamentals (bookings and outlook) reported by most resi solar companies. We believe a combination of improving bookings momentum and execution on the financing front would be required for investor sentiment to improve. In the medium term, we also believe net metering policy overhang would need to be resolved for resi solar stocks to see meaningful share price appreciation. Most of these stocks are currently trading at or below the value of operating assets and investors are not giving any credit for the development business. VSLR remains our top pick within the resi leasing coverage universe.

    Traditional Developers/Manufacturers Also Remain In Penalty Box

    For solar developers/installers such as FSLR, SPWR, 2017 earnings/EBITDA outlook remains the biggest focus for investors. Concerns about rising Chinese competition and impact on module segment margins along with lack of visibility/profitability within the systems segment remains the primary investor concern. We like both FSLR and SPWR for different reasons. In the case of FSLR we believe concerns about 2017 earnings cliff are overblown. While we expect 2017 earnings to decline, the magnitude of decline would be less than feared primarily due to upside from systems segment as well as improving margins from series 5/6 production ramp. For SPWR, we believe the 2017 EBITDA would still be similar to 2016 levels due to 600MW of capacity expansion as well as more diversified business model mix. Pick-up in business momentum, which could be driven by bookings outlook would be an important catalyst for both shares, in our view.

    Chinese Solar, Inverters Unlikely to Gain Near Term Traction, Remain Selective with Yieldcos

    Chinese companies remain in a tough spot - investors are concerned about peaking margins, rising receivables and subsidy payment delays for domestic project developers. Stocks are not discounting much value for projects that these companies are holding on their balance sheet. Until and unless the outlook for China market improves - both from subsidy payment and installation volume standpoints, we do not see any meaningful catalyst for Chinese solar stocks. Inverter companies are similarly impacted by concerns about pricing pressure from Enphase as well as Chinese string inverter companies. We believe margin pressure in the inverter segment is likely to increase, however upside from the storage segment is not fully priced into these shares and prefer SEDG within this category. Finally, the yieldcos are challenged by weak capital markets environment and limited opportunity for near term drop downs which in turn is impacting medium term growth outlook. We do not expect CAFD to tap the capital markets in order to achieve 2017 dividend growth and expect shares to gradually grind higher as the company executes on dividend targets.

    Buy-Side Views/Our Take SCTY: Least-desired name on concerns that there could a liquidity event in 2016. Investors believe 2016 guide is still aggressive (and back-end loaded). Plus the company is really all over the place - resi leasing, now pushing direct sale and is also entering C&I, utility scale. Additionally, the company is adding manufacturing capacity which means the funding requirements could remain high in the medium term. Investors are also really frustrated by a series of earnings disappointment and remain cautious about the development of various state level policies. Recent cash equity transaction also makes it difficult to assess the value of underlying assets. SPWR: Despite large Total ownership and relatively attractive valuation, SPWR shares remain out of favor due to low float and complexity in modeling earnings/EBITDA. Considering the low market cap and potential concerns over a sharp decline in 2017 earnings /EBITDA due to rollover of legacy projects, lot of investors we spoke with were unwilling to spend the time and model 2017 earnings/EBITDA. Slowdown of the resi market in the U.S. and concerns over pricing power/ramp of P-series manufacturing also remain an overhang. SEDG: One of the biggest concerns for investors is longer-term profitability of the optimizer/inverter business model. How can SEDG maintain 30% margins in an environment where the module players are earnings high single digit/low teens margins and when the large leasing customers are laser-focused on bringing costs down? The slowdown of the US resi market due to policy uncertainty also appears to be weighing on the shares. SEDG does get credit for simplification of the story and business model as well as strong focus on cost reduction/differentiated product portfolio. ENPH: The single-most important question for ENPH investors is whether the company can drive costs down fast enough and reduce cash burn while maintaining market share? The slow growth of US DG market is also not helping overall investor sentiment. Plus investors are getting increasingly concerned about increased competition and pricing pressure from string inverter companies getting into the space. The only potential positive question we get from investors is whether this company eventually becomes an M&A target and can successfully execute its storage strategy? FSLR: In the case of FSLR, we highlight most commonly asked investor questions below: 7 June 2016 Clean Technology Solar Update Page 4 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. There is some uncertainty with respect to outlook of the US utility scale market, in light of the recent stay on Clean Power Plan. Can FSRL grow bookings in this environment? FSLR is working on a significant number of late stage bookings opportunities which could drive book-to-bill above 1.0 in 2H16. The company is working on close to 1GW of systems related opportunity between now and year-end. FSLR continues to see significant amount of activity within the US (both utility scale and C&I) – NV casinos looking to go off-grid, Apple, Amazon, community solar are a few examples of US project activity. International markets also remain extremely robust from a volume stand point (Morocco, Dubai, Mexico, India); however economics remain challenging. The company plans to be mostly a module provider in international markets. FSLR’s revenues and earnings have been largely influenced by legacy systems business. What’s the outlook for systems business beyond 2017? The company still expects to recognize revenues on 1GW of systems business from 2017 (mostly US and Japan) and is working on 2017 CODs totaling ~500MW. In terms of project sales, Moapa project will be sold this year one way or the other. The company would be recognizing $145M in equity earnings in 2016 (including 8Point3 contribution of ~$25M). With some of the project push outs, we expect this number to decrease sharply in 2017. Bookings opportunity, cadence and margins FSLR is looking at close to 1GW of systems related bookings opportunity between now and the year end. Majority of this systems business opportunity appears to be in the U.S. and Japan and we believe the company would be in a position to achieve 2H16 book-to-bill of greater than 1.0. Systems bookings tend to be lumpy. However, mgmt remains confident of achieving 1GW+ systems shipments on an annual basis from 2017. Within the international markets, the company mostly sees opportunity in the module business. With risk of increased competition from Chinese module suppliers, how can FSLR maintain component gross margins above 20%? FSLR’s module cost as of Q3’15 were below 40c/W and with series 6 ramp, we anticipate costs to decrease to low 30c/W levels. Series 5, 6 ramp could result in 150-200 bps of systems margins improvement. First, capex of series 6 capacity is 40% lower compared to capex of series 4 capacity. Second, series 5 and 6 modules do not require connectors, clips and other BoS components, which results in overall lower component as well as labor costs. How should we think about R&D and cash requirements? In terms of incremental R&D expenditures, FSLR does not anticipate any incremental R&D spend on series 5/6 technology. In terms of minimum cash requirement, FSLR believes that $500M of cash would be sufficient to successfully compete and develop projects in the US and international markets. Why is Jim Hughes leaving the company? Jim’s involvement with FSLR goes back to the time when he was helping the company develop a strategic plan. The conversation at that time and his 7 June 2016 Clean Technology Solar Update Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Page 5 involvement evolved into a board request to take on an executive role. According to Jim, he was never keen to run a public company for a long period of time. Jim completed the 4 year plan and hit every target that was laid out. Going forward, FSLR has to make a lot of very positive decisions and both Jim as well as the board believes it is prudent to allow new leadership to own the strategy over the next 5 years. What is going on with respect to near term industry fundamentals? The entire US solar industry was gearing for end of ITC extension and given the extension, there is a lot of uncertainty as to how 2017 fundamentals would shape up. The CPP uncertainty is impacting timing of utility scale roll-out. On a 5 year horizon, the future has never looked brighter. The company is already working on a significant number of projects that would be delivered in 2018/19/20 timeframe. Why did FSLR not provide specific cost/efficiency roadmaps at the Analyst Day? Product mix was one of the main reasons why FSLR did not provide specific roadmaps. How does FSLR think about product mix? Series 4 will remain the primary near term focus for FSLR. This is the right product for lower labor cost markets. Series 5 on the other hand is the right product for higher labor cost markets.


    Post a Comment

    Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

    << Home